[petsc-dev] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

[Matthew Knepley]

Fix the mail headers for this thing. My message is below.

   Matt

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at mailrelay.anl.gov>
Date: Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:44 PM
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: knepley at gmail.com


This is the mail system at host mailrelay.anl.gov.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                  The mail system

<petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: host zimbra.anl.gov[130.202.101.12] said: 550
5.1.1
   <petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: Recipient address rejected: zimbra.anl.gov(in
   reply to RCPT TO command)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov
Original-Recipient: rfc822;petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; zimbra.anl.gov
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov>: Recipient
address
   rejected: zimbra.anl.gov


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
To: petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov, For users of the development version of PETSc
<petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov>
Cc:
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:44:32 -0600
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Merge sets
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> > I have lost the BB battle, however can we at least start using
> >
> >   hg pull --rebase
> >
> > so that we avoid this
> >
> >   https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/changeset/ad9064ecab66
>
>
>  1) I don't like the idea of a pull doing anything locally on my machine.
> I want it to only get the stuff from the remote repository and bring it to
> my machine. This reeks of svn
>

I see it as a replacement for multiple repositories and carefully
orchestrated pulling, like Linus used to do, in order
to keep change sets clean. It is not giving up on the concept of change
sets like svn.


>  2) If the rebase implementation has been fixed from the hacky versions
> that fucked unnecessarily with my file system I'll be happy to start using
> rebase. Is it fixed?
>

I cannot identify the behavior from that description. However, I have been
using it for almost a year now, and the
nice thing is that if anything goes wrong (merges with MacHg can screw up
badly), I just do

  hg rollback
  hg revert --all

You might be talking about the need to revert.

    Matt


>   Barry
>
> >
> >      Matt
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener




-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120218/1cff445f/attachment.html>