[petsc-dev] please make myself and Satish admin on bitbucket.org/petsc

[Satish Balay]

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
> 
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
> 
> > What if I don't have an openid?
> > 
> > Everything uses OpenID now and bitbucket uses it too. I went over this with you last time. Your gmail, facebook, yahoo, etc. are all automatically OpenIDs.
> 
>   I sure don't want to use my facebook account to access work related stuff, that is absurd.
> 
> >  
> > petsc is another account like barryfsmith is an account? Who designed this monstrosity?
> > 
> > Of course 'petsc' is another account. How else would it work?
> 
>    Bitbucket should have a concept of "accounts" (each of us has one of these) and "repository trees" (which can be equally shared by one or more accounts).  To use accounts to hold a repository tree is moronic because it makes unsymmetric the relationship between the owner of the account that owns the repository tree and the other accounts that can do stuff with that repository tree.  So what other idiotic decisions did these morons make?

Actually I think all accounts are equivalent and symmetric [I can have
repos in my account and share, you can have repos in yours and share].

I think Sean created a separate 'petsc' account - so that we just have
nice urls similar to the current petsc urls..

bkbits.org/petsc/reponame

Sure - there is no repository trees - like

bkbits.org/balay/petsc/reponame

Or perhaps you are saying eventhoug one has bkbits.org/balay/ [for
'balay' account] - I should be able to register 'petsc','foobar' as
project names to obtain bkbits.org/petsc bkbits.org/foobar url - but
that gets a bit conveluted..

satish


> 
>    Sorry but this bit of bad design needs to posted on  petsc-dev so Jed and Matt can provide some rationalization for the stupidity.
> 
>    Barry
> 
> 
>