[petsc-dev] Counting Fortran function pointers

[Matthew Knepley]

On Dec 4, 2012 7:42 PM, "Jed Brown" <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think all of these Fortran pointers should be string attached. We do
>> not need speed here, and it
>> is consistent, extensible, and no less safe than the crap in there now.
>
>
> It _is_ in the critical path. These function calls are made every
function evaluation or every matrix multiply, etc.

1 eval every mstmult or residual? That is tiny

   Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121204/d0dc0c23/attachment.html>