[petsc-dev] Patch review

[Barry Smith]

On Aug 24, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> 
> I'm a little concerned that the current review process is all ex post facto. It makes more work for reviewers and the history ends up looking confusing. I think we should work out a review process that can happen before things are pushed to petsc-dev, so that the authors of the patches can clean them up in response to comments. When done right, this ends up being less work for both the reviewers and the authors.

   Propose a system.


    Barry

   Just make sure it doesn't involve Sean holding the master password for the petsc repository and then getting hacked again.