[petsc-dev] various dot products messed up for complex numbers?

[Jed Brown]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 20:17, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> The truth is likely that except for CG most of the methods were coded
> without regard to complex and are likely wrong but not necessarily wrong in
> a consistent way or even self-consistently wrong.


This fixes Alexander Grayver's reported problem with TFQMR. I still don't
know if CG is correct, but it should be easy to check.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120417/36b57626/attachment.html>