[petsc-dev] Should -pc_type mg be a linear preconditioner by default?
Jed Brown
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Oct 25 16:34:21 CDT 2011
Now that lots of people are getting -pc_type mg without using DMMG, we don't
have FGMRES (or GCR) by default. But the current default for smoothers is to
use -mg_levels_ksp_type gmres which is nonlinear. This causes -pc_type mg to
fail even when MG works great.
I think that in the end, most people don't actually want to use GMRES on
levels (because the synchronization costs dominate on coarse levels), but
it's more robust when you are playing with smoothers. Should we switch to
using Richardson on levels by default?
Or should we have some way to automatically identify a preconditioner as
nonlinear so that the library can default to a flexible Krylov method in
such cases?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111025/518e28b4/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list