[petsc-dev] Are odd grid numbers intentionally required for structured interpolation/refinement in 3.2.2?

[Aron Ahmadia]

Thanks guys, I will try to send you pictures/video after the demonstration
this Wednesday.

-Aron

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
>   Note also you can use -da_refine <n>  Then it takes the initial grid
> sizes and refines n times before creating the DA, then it does multigrid
> with n+1 levels. If you do it this way you don't have to mess around with
> figuring what numbers to put in -da_grid_x 127   or whatever.
>
>    Barry
>
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 05:23, Aron Ahmadia <aron.ahmadia at kaust.edu.sa>
> wrote:
> > Jed pointed out that I should be demo-ing ex50, not ex19, so I tried to
> port my stuff over.  Oddly enough, if I am using 2^n grid spacing,
> everything falls over. 2^n+1 works, though, which seems non-obvious to me.
> >
> > --- petsc-ex50/ex50 ‹master*➔ M⁇› » mpirun -n 4 ./ex50 -da_grid_x 65
> -da_grid_y 65 -pc_type mg -pc_mg_levels 3
> > lid velocity = 0.000236686, prandtl # = 1, grashof # = 1
> > Number of Newton iterations = 6
> >
> > ./ex50 -da_grid_x 64 -da_grid_y 64 -pc_type mg -pc_mg_levels 2
> >
> > lid velocity = 0.000244141, prandtl # = 1, grashof # = 1
> > [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message
> ------------------------------------
> > [0]PETSC ERROR: Arguments are incompatible!
> > [0]PETSC ERROR: Ratio between levels: (mx - 1)/(Mx - 1) must be integer:
> mx 64 Mx 32!
> >
> > DMMG always started with a coarse problem and refined a given number of
> times regardless of whether linear or nonlinear multigrid is being used.
> >
> > Now we have
> >
> > -snes_grid_sequence NLEVELS
> >
> > which starts with whatever grid you give it and refines. If you use
> -snes_grid_sequence N -pc_type mg, then the number of levels in PCMG will be
> automatically changed inside the grid sequencing so that it references the
> same coarse level.
> >
> > If instead, you only do linear multigrid, then you pass
> >
> > -pc_type mg -pc_mg_levels N
> >
> > and your specified problem is _coarsened_ to produce the number of
> levels. That coarsening requires some divisbility in the grid size. The
> reason it is 2^n+1 instead of 2^n is because this example uses a
> vertex-centered instead cell-centered discretization. This is natural for
> finite differences instead of finite volumes, but either method could be
> used with either centering strategy.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111009/99d2683b/attachment.html>