[petsc-dev] Should pARMS converge in parallel?

[Jose E. Roman]

El 16/03/2011, a las 21:54, Jed Brown escribió:

> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 21:49, Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es> wrote:
> Yes, I am aware of this. I added a note to the PCPARMS manpage stating that this preconditioner should be used with flexible methods (fgmres, gcr).
> 
> Aha, I should have read it. Still seems like a common gotcha so defaulting to linear would be nice.

I am attaching a patch that sets default values that should work irrespective of the number of processors, even without flexible solvers.

Jed, can you commit the changes?

Thanks.
Jose

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch-parms-defaults
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 661 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110318/90b0d7e9/attachment.obj>