[petsc-dev] DM interface versus implementation headers

[Jed Brown]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 14:52, Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey, What's the status of the rule that #include <petsc.h> should give
> you all of PETSc? I've just tried to build petsc4py-dev, and things
> failed really bad...
>

We worked out the missing include and petsc4py has been updated for recent
changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20110314/f975018e/attachment.html>