[petsc-dev] Overzealous guards in DMGetInjection_DA

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Feb 25 19:14:07 CST 2011


On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Jed Brown wrote:

>   ierr = DMDAGetInfo(dac,&dimc,&Mc,&Nc,&Pc,&mc,&nc,&pc,&dofc,&sc,&wrapc,&stc);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   ierr = DMDAGetInfo(daf,&dimf,&Mf,&Nf,&Pf,&mf,&nf,&pf,&doff,&sf,&wrapf,&stf);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (dimc != dimf) SETERRQ2(((PetscObject)daf)->comm,PETSC_ERR_ARG_INCOMP,"Dimensions of DMDA do not match %D %D",dimc,dimf);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (dofc != doff) SETERRQ2(((PetscObject)daf)->comm,PETSC_ERR_ARG_INCOMP,"DOF of DMDA do not match %D %D",dofc,doff);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (sc != sf) SETERRQ2(((PetscObject)daf)->comm,PETSC_ERR_ARG_INCOMP,"Stencil width of DMDA do not match %D %D",sc,sf);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (wrapc != wrapf) SETERRQ(((PetscObject)daf)->comm,PETSC_ERR_ARG_INCOMP,"Periodic type different in two DMDAs");CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (stc != stf) SETERRQ(((PetscObject)daf)->comm,PETSC_ERR_ARG_INCOMP,"Stencil type different in two DMDAs");CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   if (Mc < 2) SETERRQ(PETSC_COMM_SELF,PETSC_ERR_ARG_OUTOFRANGE,"Coarse grid requires at least 2 points in x direction");
>   if (dimc > 1 && Nc < 2) SETERRQ(PETSC_COMM_SELF,PETSC_ERR_ARG_OUTOFRANGE,"Coarse grid requires at least 2 points in y direction");
>   if (dimc > 2 && Pc < 2) SETERRQ(PETSC_COMM_SELF,PETSC_ERR_ARG_OUTOFRANGE,"Coarse grid requires at least 2 points in z direction");
> 
> Several of these are not necessary. DMGetInjection_DA_3D:
> 
>   ierr = DMDAGetInfo(dac,0,&Mx,&My,&Mz,0,0,0,0,0,&pt,0);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>   ierr = DMDAGetInfo(daf,0,&mx,&my,&mz,0,0,0,&dof,0,0,0);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> 
> Seems silly to fail when not necessary. I'm inclined to move the guards into the specific implementation so that only the necessary amount of consistency needs to be checked. How about getting rid of DMGetInjection_DA entirely and just set the appropriate ops slot?

   Right. Feel free to split it apart into the separate functions that go into the slot and remove the DMGetInjection_DA

   It is just of this style because it was coded before DM was a gleam in my eye and needs refactoring

   Barry





More information about the petsc-dev mailing list