[petsc-dev] pushing MASSIVE change to PETSc-dev
    Barry Smith 
    bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
       
    Thu Apr 21 10:25:08 CDT 2011
    
    
  
On Apr 21, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> One consequence of this change is that, in general, it should no longer be necessary to use the construct
> 
> if (x->y) {ierr = YDestroy(x->y);CHKERRQ(ierr)}
> 
> Instead, you should be able to always use
> 
> ierr = YDestroy(&x->y);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> 
> There are still some of the former around, but it should not be used in new code.
   Correct, I removed all that I found but may have missed a few. Also you need not do VecDestroy(x->y); x->y = 0; since the destroy handles that automatically. I will make another sweep through the code to try to eliminate the unneeded checks.
    Barry
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list