[petsc-dev] pushing MASSIVE change to PETSc-dev
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Apr 21 10:25:08 CDT 2011
On Apr 21, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> One consequence of this change is that, in general, it should no longer be necessary to use the construct
>
> if (x->y) {ierr = YDestroy(x->y);CHKERRQ(ierr)}
>
> Instead, you should be able to always use
>
> ierr = YDestroy(&x->y);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
> There are still some of the former around, but it should not be used in new code.
Correct, I removed all that I found but may have missed a few. Also you need not do VecDestroy(x->y); x->y = 0; since the destroy handles that automatically. I will make another sweep through the code to try to eliminate the unneeded checks.
Barry
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list