[petsc-dev] [fortran] DAVecGetArrayF90 error
Leo van Kampenhout
lvankampenhout at gmail.com
Fri Sep 3 07:19:24 CDT 2010
i mean chance
2010/9/3 Leo van Kampenhout <lvankampenhout at gmail.com>
> Any change of this being fixed in the coming week? I would appreciate it :)
>
>
>
> 2010/9/2 Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
>
>
>> On Sep 2, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:37:04 +0200, Leo van Kampenhout <
>> lvankampenhout at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> since a few days I'm getting these errors during runtime (did not have
>> it
>> >> before! )
>> >>
>> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: src/dm/da/src/f90-custom/zda1f90.c:109:
>> >> __FUNCT__="VecRestoreArrayPrivate3" does not agree with
>> >> __func__="davecgetarrayf903_"
>> >> [0]PETSC ERROR: src/dm/da/src/f90-custom/zda1f90.c:109:
>> >> __FUNCT__="VecRestoreArrayPrivate3" does not agree with
>> >> __func__="davecgetarrayf903_"
>> >
>> > Thanks for pointing this out.
>> >
>> We should just be consistent. If they use part of the constructs they
>> should use them all. Note you cannot use PetscFunctionReturn(0) for these I
>> guess you can use PetscFunctionReturnVoid()
>>
>> Ok who will fix these?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Barry/Satish, should ftn-custom functions use PetscFunctionBegin/Return
>> > or not? Most of them don't, but there are a few. In this particular
>> > file, there aren't even any PetscFunctionReturns, and there are no
>> > __FUNCT__ definitions in the -custom files that do have matching
>> > Begin/Returns.
>> >
>> > Jed
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100903/747765ff/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list