[petsc-dev] Fwd: [petsc-maint #56111] petsc4py does not work with complex numbers?

[Lisandro Dalcin]

On 15 November 2010 19:01, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I get the following with complex enabled. Does this mean 'some tests
> run but others fail'?
>
> I guess we'll have to wait for Lisandro to reply..
>

Complex numbers should work just fine, at least with 3.1, I'm going to
check against petsc-dev.

>
> asterix:/home/balay/tmp/petsc-dev/externalpackages/petsc4py-dev>make test
> python test/runtests.py < /dev/null
> [0 at asterix] Python 2.7 (/usr/bin/python)
> [0 at asterix] PETSc 3.1.0-p5 development (conf: 'asterix64')
> [0 at asterix] petsc4py 1.1.2 (build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/petsc4py)
> .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................EE...................................................................................................F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F.......
>  .F........F........F........F.........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F........F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F..F...................FE..........FF.FEF...........F.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................FFFF........FFFF................................................................F...F..F.......F...F..F.......F...F..F........
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: testSetMonitor (test_ksp.TestKSPBCGSL)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "test/test_ksp.py", line 154, in testSetMonitor
>    self.testSolve()
>  File "test/test_ksp.py", line 132, in testSolve
>    self.ksp.solve(b, x)
>  File "KSP.pyx", line 326, in petsc4py.PETSc.KSP.solve (src/petsc4py.PETSc.c:89419)
> Error: error code 62
> [0] KSPSolve() line 427 in src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
> [0] KSPSolve_BCGSL() line 241 in src/ksp/ksp/impls/bcgsl/bcgsl.c
> [0] VecMAXPY() line 1202 in src/vec/vec/interface/rvector.c
> [0] Invalid argument
> [0] Scalar value must be same on all processes, argument # 3
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: testSolve (test_ksp.TestKSPBCGSL)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "test/test_ksp.py", line 132, in testSolve
>    self.ksp.solve(b, x)
>  File "KSP.pyx", line 326, in petsc4py.PETSc.KSP.solve (src/petsc4py.PETSc.c:89419)
> Error: error code 62
> [0] KSPSolve() line 427 in src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
> [0] KSPSolve_BCGSL() line 241 in src/ksp/ksp/impls/bcgsl/bcgsl.c
> [0] VecMAXPY() line 1202 in src/vec/vec/interface/rvector.c
> [0] Invalid argument
> [0] Scalar value must be same on all processes, argument # 3
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: testCreateTranspose (test_mat_py.TestDiagonal)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "test/test_mat_py.py", line 100, in tearDown
>    self.assertEqual(getrefcount(ctx), 2)
> AssertionError: 3 != 2
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: testMultTransposeNewMeth (test_mat_py.TestIdentity)
> ---------------------------
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >    Could someone who knows answer this? If it supports complex then we'll need to change the flag in petsc4py.py
>> >
>> >   Barry
>> >
>> > *******************************************************************************
>> >          UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS    (see configure.log for details):
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Cannot use petsc4py with complex numbers it is not coded for this capability
>> > *******************************************************************************
>> >   File "./config/configure.py", line 260, in petsc_configure
>> >     framework.configure(out = sys.stdout)
>> >   File "/Users/srinath/work/Packages/rev-packages/petsc-dev/config/BuildSystem/config/framework.py", line 977, in configure
>> >     child.configure()
>> >   File "/Users/srinath/work/Packages/rev-packages/petsc-dev/config/BuildSystem/config/package.py", line 488, in configure
>> >     self.consistencyChecks()
>> >   File "/Users/srinath/work/Packages/rev-packages/petsc-dev/config/PETSc/package.py", line 40, in consistencyChecks
>> >     raise RuntimeError('Cannot use '+self.name+' with complex numbers it is not coded for this capability')
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Begin forwarded message:
>> >
>> >> From: Srinath Vadlamani <srinath at txcorp.com>
>> >> Date: November 15, 2010 3:27:55 PM CST
>> >> To: petsc-maint <petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov>
>> >> Subject: [petsc-maint #56111] petsc4py does not work with complex numbers?
>> >> Reply-To: petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov, Srinath Vadlamani <srinath at txcorp.com>
>> >>
>> >> Is this true?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> =========================
>> >> Srinath Vadlamani, PhD.
>> >> Tech-X Corp. Research Scientist
>> >> 5621 Arapahoe Ave. Suite A
>> >> Boulder, CO 80303
>> >> 303-996-2034
>> >> =========================
>> >>
>> >> Is this true?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> =========================
>> >> Srinath Vadlamani, PhD.
>> >> Tech-X Corp. Research Scientist
>> >> 5621 Arapahoe Ave. Suite A
>> >> Boulder, CO 80303
>> >> 303-996-2034
>> >> =========================
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>



-- 
Lisandro Dalcin
---------------
CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL)
Predio CONICET-Santa Fe
Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo
Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011)
Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169