[petsc-dev] ASM request
Jed Brown
jed at 59A2.org
Tue Mar 16 13:26:27 CDT 2010
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:51:53 -0500, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> If you use ILU(0) and the inplace option then it only needs one copy
> of the blocks instead of the two.
With block Jacobi, it would be possible to avoid copying out the
sub-blocks by assembling into a matrix with the blocks already defined
(I think that Dmitry's MatFwk will allow this). Similarly for
Neumann-Neumann with many blocks per process.
It would also be possible to assemble matrices with overlapping
subdomains, and define MatMult suitably (dropping redundant dofs). I
don't know whether Dmitry has plans to support this.
Jed
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list