[petsc-dev] Why both DMMGGetFine and DMMGGetDMMG?

[Barry Smith]

    Thanks for the reminder. Now if hg's gui's didn't totally suck I  
would have found that.

    No, don't change it. It is good for them to be different. Please  
add this sentence to developers.tex so we remember it.

    Thanks


     Barry

On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Satish Balay wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 3d5df68fd46b
> Author: balay at asterix.mcs.anl.gov  2005-05-26 14:19:16
>
>      PETSc ojects [with PETSCHEADER] - use _p_ - else use _n_
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> I don't remember the discussions at that time for this change - so I'm
> fine with reverting..
>
> Satish
>
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:07:32 -0600, Matthew Knepley  
>> <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Where is all this stuff (and what) ?
>>
>> C-. _n_<TAB>
>>
>> Possible completions are:
>> _n_ClassPerfLog
>> _n_ClassRegLog
>> _n_DMMG
>> _n_EventPerfLog
>> _n_EventRegLog
>> _n_ISColoring
>> _n_IntStack
>> _n_PetscBag
>> _n_PetscBagItem
>> _n_PetscDLLibrary
>> _n_PetscFList
>> _n_PetscOList
>> _n_PetscSubcomm
>> _n_PetscTable
>> _n_PetscViewers
>> _n_SDA
>> _n_StageLog
>> _n_Vecs
>>
>>
>> Jed
>>
>