[petsc-dev] Mat/DM dependency

[Jed Brown]

On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:50:33 -0600, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> That is definitely a problem. It makes me think we need an R^N part just
> like we have now, and then a more general part with operators on fiber
> bundles.

The question is whether it is important to separate that stuff (which
depends on both Vec and DM) from DM (which already depends on Vec).

Jed