[petsc-dev] New ILU, associativity changes
Hong Zhang
hzhang at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Feb 24 08:58:58 CST 2010
Jed,
Can you simply your test into a small petsc example that repeats
this behavior?
I want test it myself to make sure the differences are not
result of bug in the new implementation.
Hong
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> I notice low-bit differences between the new ILU and versions from
> last
> month. From one of my tests:
>
> -Algebraic residual |x|_1 9.35e-16 |x|_2 2.59e-16 |x|_inf
> 1.67e-16
> +Algebraic residual |x|_1 1.09e-15 |x|_2 3.00e-16 |x|_inf
> 1.67e-16
> -Algebraic residual |x|_1 6.18e-12 |x|_2 2.59e-13 |x|_inf
> 4.08e-14
> +Algebraic residual |x|_1 6.19e-12 |x|_2 2.59e-13 |x|_inf
> 4.08e-14
> -Algebraic residual |x|_1 4.85e-12 |x|_2 1.95e-13 |x|_inf
> 4.73e-14
> +Algebraic residual |x|_1 4.84e-12 |x|_2 1.95e-13 |x|_inf
> 4.73e-14
> -Algebraic residual |x|_1 3.36e-13 |x|_2 1.56e-14 |x|_inf
> 3.06e-15
> +Algebraic residual |x|_1 3.32e-13 |x|_2 1.54e-14 |x|_inf
> 3.05e-15
>
> I'm guessing this comes from traversing rows in the other order during
> backsolve. This is no problem at all since both are equally valid, I
> just wanted to note that some rounding effects are visible.
>
> Jed
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list