Jed Brown jed at 59A2.org
Tue Dec 7 14:28:39 CST 2010

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 21:25, Dmitry Karpeev <karpeev at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> As far as I can tell, the "local form" idea implies some mesh with a
> stencil or overlap behind a Vec,
> which by itself is a purely algebraic construct. Does this mean that we are
> injecting some geometry
> into Vec's semantics?

Certainly not geometry.  It's topologically-derived information which
currently sits in VecScatter (ignoring VecGhost for now).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101207/8a048c61/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list