[petsc-dev] When __FUNCT__ is wrong

[Satish Balay]

I see Jed has a "User provided function" exception in
PetscCheck__FUNCT__(). I was thinking of this issue [user code
warnings with no funct usage] - when I suggested the configure option.

So - at this point - I'm fine with current code..

Satish

On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
> On Aug 28, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > The addition in my sugestion was to have a configure option to
> > enable-disable PetscCheck__FUNCT__()
> > 
>     It is fine to have that configure option. My concern is the default, if we default off then no one will remember to turn it on and test if we default on then it will annoy many users. I say default off and make some nightly builds have it on.
> 
>    Barry
> 
> 
> > Satish
> > 
> >> 
> >>   Barry
> >>> 
> >>> The error check option [for __FUNCT__ being correct] should just be a
> >>> special case test for us - or users - so an explicit configure can be
> >>> used for it.
> >>> 
> >>> Satish
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
>