petscblaslapack, new routines

[Jed Brown]

Barry Smith wrote:
> 
>   Satish,
> 
>     My understanding was that fblaslapack already had the full set of
> blas/lapack?

I'm just referring to include/petscblaslapack* which only have C
prototypes for the couple that are actually used in PETSc.

Is fblaslapack really different from what's on netlib?  I always assumed
it was just bundled and would thus have everything.

Jed

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090929/746dba81/attachment.sig>