Should PetscObjectName be collective?

[Lisandro Dalcin]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>  Ok, we could just put the "counter" into the MPI attribute and then just
> have uniqueness of the names within each communicator.  This would solve
> Jed's problem cleanly.
>

I agree. +1 on this.

>
>  We don't have any way of requiring the user to use Unique names anyways.
>

With great power comes great responsibility...

-- 
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594