SNESSetUp() and matrix-free options
Jed Brown
jed at 59A2.org
Thu May 7 15:47:18 CDT 2009
Barry Smith wrote:
> It is always possible someone has two options that conflict with each
> other in the options database. This is suppose to generate an
> error. and the only solution is for user to change one of them.
My point is that -snes_mf and -snes_mf_operator are not really that
different. If there is only one option, then the options database will
only know about the last one and there is no conflict. For example, I
could put -pc_type lu in .petscrc, and then put -pc_type asm on the
command line without conflicts. I am suggesting making sure that there
is only one way to select the snes_mf variant on the command line in
order to eliminate unnecessary possible conflicts.
Jed
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090507/f4f4b9fb/attachment.sig>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list