why not a single PETSc library

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 16:37:20 CDT 2009

I think its legitimate to only want some of our crap.


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>  In the old days we stored the compiled PETSc into a collection of
> libraries to make linking faster.
>  Today, is there any reason not to just have all the compiled PETSc code go
> in libpetsc.XXXX?
>  Barry

What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090609/d086b24c/attachment.html>

More information about the petsc-dev mailing list