need review of two patches

[Barry Smith]

   Lisandro,

    Looks ok to me, go ahead and stick them in. If problems come up  
we'll deal
with them.

    Barry

On Oct 20, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

> Barry (or someone), could you please review this two patches for
> BuildSystem and config/PETSc? In short, the intentions are the
> following:
>
> 1) Make BuildSystem/config/setCompilers.py set 'dynamicLibraries'
> regardeless of PETSc's configure options. Then, if dlopening is
> available, the 'dynamicLibraries' will be true even if petsc is
> configured to be built with static libraries.
>
> 2) add PETSC_{HAVE|USE}_{SHARED|DYNAMIC}_LIBRARIES. The 'HAVE' means
> the platform support it, the 'USE' means PETSc is configured to use it
> (note: if USE_DINAMIC is defined, then USE_SHARED is also defined).
> Hope this is not confusing!
>
> 3) Some extra checks for Windows DLL API and dlopen API.
>
>
> -- 
> Lisandro Dalcín
> ---------------
> Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
> Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
> Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
> PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
> Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
> <BuildSystem.diff><config_PETSc.diff>