How come it is PetscEvent but all the routines that act on it are PetscLogEventXXXX()?

[Matthew Knepley]

Actually, I would argue that these methods do not actually act on PetscEvent
at all (which is just an integer), but rather on a PetscLog. That is why I named
them that way.

  Matt

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
>    Doesn't seem right.
>
>    Barry
>
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener