With intel 2015.1.133 and gcc 5.1.0 in the path, error on make check with cxx interface
Wei-keng Liao
wkliao at eecs.northwestern.edu
Mon Jun 1 18:24:27 CDT 2015
Hi, Nick
I tried to see if any place that can indirectly invoke that message, but could not find one.
I wonder if you can kindly help me find more information about this error, by rebuilding your PnetCDF with the following configure command (with debug option enabled):
./configure --enable-debug --disable-fortran --with-mpi=/zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/XeonX5550/openmpi/1.8.5/intel-15.0.1
Disabling Fortran gives you a shorter build time.
Once you build it, please cd directly to test/CXX and run "make check" there.
This can skip all other tests.
thanks
Wei-keng
On Jun 1, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:
> Oh, yeah sorry. it is the latest 1.6.0 version.
> Here is a tar with the config.log and the tmp.test (it was 1 mb, so sorry for taring).
>
>
>
> 2015-06-02 0:16 GMT+02:00 Wei-keng Liao <wkliao at eecs.northwestern.edu>:
> That message "ncmpi_inq_typeids not implemented" should not appear.
> It is fishy.
>
> I forgot to ask the PnetCDF version you are using.
> Please let me know. Also, please send me the file config.log. Thanks.
>
> Wei-keng
>
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:
>
> > Oh, and I do not have these problems using pure gcc 5.1.0 on my local machine.
> >
> > 2015-06-02 0:00 GMT+02:00 Nick Papior Andersen <nickpapior at gmail.com>:
> > Dear Wei-keng and Rob,
> >
> > My default options did not include -g flag, so the coredump was quite un-useful ;(
> >
> > I did the catchsegv thing... Here is the output:
> >
> > $> catchsegv ./nctst ./testfile.nc
> > ncmpi_inq_typeids not implemented
> > *** Segmentation fault
> > Register dump:
> >
> > RAX: 00002b61bec50000 RBX: 00002b61bec50000 RCX: 000000000000000c
> > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00002b61bec50000 RDI: 00007fff5e677fa0
> > RBP: 00007fff5e677fa0 R8 : 0000000000e79b60 R9 : 00000000000000f0
> > R10: 00007fff5e677d70 R11: 00002b61be9e1560 R12: 00007fff5e6780e0
> > R13: 00007fff5e678920 R14: 000000000000004c R15: 00007fff5e677fa0
> > RSP: 00007fff5e677f60
> >
> > RIP: 00002b61be9e0e79 EFLAGS: 00010206
> >
> > CS: 0033 FS: 0000 GS: 0000
> >
> > Trap: 0000000e Error: 00000005 OldMask: 00000000 CR2: ffffffe8
> >
> > FPUCW: 0000037f FPUSW: 00000000 TAG: 00002b61
> > RIP: bf8f7fff RDP: 5e677ff0
> >
> > ST(0) 0000 0000000000000033 ST(1) 0000 000000000000000d
> > ST(2) 0000 0000000000c80000 ST(3) 0000 0000000000000640
> > ST(4) 0000 0000000000000000 ST(5) 0000 0000000000000000
> > ST(6) 0000 0000000000000000 ST(7) 8000 8000000000000000
> > mxcsr: 9fe0
> > XMM0: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM1: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM2: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM3: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM4: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM5: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM6: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM7: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM8: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM9: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM10: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM11: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM12: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM13: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > XMM14: 00000000000000000000000000000000 XMM15: 00000000000000000000000000000000
> >
> > Backtrace:
> > /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZNSo6sentryC2ERSo+0x19)[0x2b61be9e0e79]
> > /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZSt16__ostream_insertIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_PKS3_l+0x29)[0x2b61be9e1589]
> > /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc+0x27)[0x2b61be9e19e7]
> > ??:0(_Z3genRKP19ompi_communicator_tPKcN7PnetCDF9NcmpiFile10FileFormatE)[0x40d4a5]
> > ??:0(main)[0x409f60]
> > /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2b61bf0a5d5d]
> > ??:0(_start)[0x409cb9]
> >
> >
> > Where I think the top line is pretty self-explanatory ;)
> > And looking at the code, it makes sense, whether it should be called at all is another matter...
> >
> > 2015-06-01 18:25 GMT+02:00 Wei-keng Liao <wkliao at eecs.northwestern.edu>:
> > Hi, Nick,
> >
> > To print the trace of a segmentation fault is easy. You can run command
> > "gdb corefile" and when at the gdb prompt, type command "where".
> > If you can send me the printout, it will be helpful.
> >
> > Just to clarify, if gcc 5.1.0 is used, are you saying there is no problem of building PnetCDF?
> > Can you tell me the configure command line you used?
> >
> > Wei-keng
> >
> > On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-06-01 17:09 GMT+02:00 Wei-keng Liao <wkliao at eecs.northwestern.edu>:
> > > Hi, Nick
> > >
> > > Your fix for the first bug makes all sense. I will add that to PnetCDF. Thanks.
> > >
> > > As for the second error, can you use gdb to print the location of the segmentation fault?
> > > I haven't done that. I would rather not go that path? I ain't an avid user of gdb (yet).
> > > Also, do both errors happen to Intel C compiler?
> > > It is only the intel cxx compiler. I only show the gcc version as intel uses that for compatibility issues. (see -gcc-name)
> > > I thought that this could be problem... Maybe it isn't.
> > >
> > > The two C compilers you used are the latest ones. I have not tried them.
> > > Could you compile/run a simple C++ program to see if gcc works in your environment?
> > > Or, if you installed gcc from source, have you tried run "make -k check"?
> > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html
> > >
> > > Gcc/g++ runs fine. I can compile 20 other different libraries with full support. If anything, it is related to the intel compiler. :(
> > > If you do not need C++ component, you can build a PnetCDF without it, by adding option
> > > "--disable-cxx" to the configure command.
> > > This is already my diverting methodology :) Thanks.
> > >
> > > By the way, I plan to release 1.6.1 today, but it will not fix the second error you are seeing.
> > > I will try if I can find those new versions of C compiler and fix the problem.
> > > The fix will have to wait for the next release, though.
> > > Ok. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks again for reporting the problem.
> > > You are welcome.
> > > Thanks for the software.
> > >
> > > Wei-keng
> > >
> > > On Jun 1, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Nick Papior Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am trying to compile and make check with these compilers:
> > > > intel 2015.1.13
> > > > and
> > > > gcc 5.1.0 in the path.
> > > >
> > > > Compiling goes fine and everything seems to link correctly.
> > > > However make check errors out in the CXX test.
> > > >
> > > > First I get this error message:
> > > > ./nctst ./testfile.nc
> > > > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::logic_error'
> > > > what(): basic_string::_M_construct null not valid
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] *** Process received signal ***
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] Signal: Aborted (6)
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] Signal code: (-6)
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf710)[0x2aae4ac54710]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 1] /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35)[0x2aae4ae94625]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 2] /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x175)[0x2aae4ae95e05]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 3] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZN9__gnu_cxx27__verbose_terminate_handlerEv+0x15d)[0x2aae4a7428cd]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 4] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(+0x8c936)[0x2aae4a740936]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 5] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(+0x8c981)[0x2aae4a740981]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 6] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(+0x8cb98)[0x2aae4a740b98]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 7] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZSt19__throw_logic_errorPKc+0x3f)[0x2aae4a767faf]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 8] ./nctst[0x461b42]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [ 9] ./nctst[0x4644b6]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [10] ./nctst[0x40c313]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [11] ./nctst[0x409f60]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [12] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2aae4ae80d5d]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] [13] ./nctst[0x409cb9]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:09803] *** End of error message ***
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Secondly I change in file src/libcxx/ncmpiType.cpp:
> > > > function inq_type has 'return NULL' which cannot be done using returns of string (unless it is a pointer, which it isn't)
> > > > So I change it to an empty string:
> > > > 'return ""'
> > > > (I am not sure when this is reached, but the error message changes as can be seen below, hence my suspicion is at that code segment)
> > > >
> > > > Now I recompile and get this alternate error message:
> > > > ./nctst ./testfile.nc
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] *** Process received signal ***
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] Failing at address: 0xffffffffffffffe8
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf710)[0x2ab6b02fa710]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 1] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZNSo6sentryC2ERSo+0x19)[0x2ab6afe61e79]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 2] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZSt16__ostream_insertIcSt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIT_T0_ES6_PKS3_l+0x29)[0x2ab6afe62589]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 3] /zdata/groups/common/nicpa/2015-test/generic/gcc/5.1.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6(_ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc+0x27)[0x2ab6afe629e7]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 4] ./nctst[0x40d4a5]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 5] ./nctst[0x409f60]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 6] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2ab6b0526d5d]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] [ 7] ./nctst[0x409cb9]
> > > > [n-62-12-2:23419] *** End of error message ***
> > > > make[2]: *** [testing] Segmentation fault
> > > >
> > > > There seem to be something fishy with the cxx interface?
> > > > I am no expert in cxx... :( So had troubles debugging further...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards Nick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kind regards Nick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards Nick
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards Nick
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards Nick
> <log-test.tar.gz>
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list