more fortran tests with pnetcdf

[Jianwei Li]

I got similar failures in a few real*4 cases when I was trying
the Intel Fortran compiler instead of g77 on a couple of Linux
Cluster systems, even with consistant ifc+icc. 
However, gcc+g77 always worked fine for me on the same systems.

It might be a compiler issue or a bug in our configure script.

Rene, 
WRT nfmpi_put_varm functions, did all of them fail or just for
real? Did nfmpi_get_varm functions pass successfully?

Thanks.

Jianwei

>On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 05:39:23PM +0200, Rene Redler wrote:
>> hi,
>> 
>>    I made some more tests with the pnetcdf lib on several
>> systems, each one showing a different and probably wrong
>> behavior.
>
>thanks for exercising our fortran interface so thouroughly.
>
>> nf_test -c  and nf_test -r run on all systems. There is
>> possibly something wrong when testing nfmpi_open. Here
>> 3 failures are produced during the -r test which should
>> probably only be one. I misinterpreted the final output,
>> and I need to have a closer look into it.
>> 
>> My first question is whether someone has managed to run
>> the full nf_test on a 32 Bit System successfully?
>
>I get the expected 3 failures under linux with g77.  That could mean
>everything is fine, or it could mean there's a bug in the test,
>though.
>
>> My test.nc contains for var_name ir:
>> 
>>  ir = -2147483648, 2147483647 ;
>
>That's what i get.
>
>> Any suggestions about what might go wrong here are more than
>> welcome since I am running out of ideas.
>
>I'm not sure right now.  I'll try things out on one of the 64 bit machines
>around here and let you know.
>
>==rob
>
>-- 
>Rob Latham
>Mathematics and Computer Science Division    A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
>Argonne National Labs, IL USA                B29D F333 664A 4280 315B