further nc_test progress
Robert Latham
robl at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Mar 20 11:15:58 CST 2003
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:02:10PM -0600, Jianwei Li wrote:
> Good news.
>
> Now, nc_test can pass most of the tests.
nc_test -c works for me, and now the strange FAILURE messages go away,
too. I couldn't figure out at all why they were happening, so i'm
glad you fixed it.
When i compare it to the test.nc file created by serial netcdf, i see
they have the same size, but different md5sums. I don't know how big
a deal it is, but to see the differences, run 'od' on both files and
compare the output.
'nc_test -r test.nc' passes everything: as you said, there is a bit of a
discrepancy between how we return error codes and how serial netcdf
returns them, but its great to see "Total number of failures: 2"
'nc_test test.nc' has a few problems for me: I was getting a couple
errors because the test did independent operations w/o putting itself
in indep mode. I fixed those, but there are still a few errors. Then
it gets to "testing ncmpi_put_var_short" and just hangs. Have you
seen this? I *am* building parallel-netcdf with mpich2, so maybe
that's a factor?
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list