further nc_test progress
Jianwei Li
jianwei at pop.ece.nwu.edu
Thu Mar 13 17:28:51 CST 2003
>Delivered-To: jianwei at fs3.ece.northwestern.edu
>Delivered-To: jianwei at pop.ece.nwu.edu
>Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:51:54 -0600
>From: Robert Latham <robl at mcs.anl.gov>
>To: Jianwei Li <jianwei at pop.ece.nwu.edu>
>Subject: Re: further nc_test progress
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
>
>On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:38:55PM -0600, Jianwei Li wrote:
>
>> Now, I'm running the tests. BTW, What are the meanings of so
>> many "FAILURE"s and "945 good comparisons"?
>
>FAILURE is any place where the nc_test program got something back from
>netcdf that it did not expect
>
>the '945 good comparisons' mean the test read that many values from
>the netcdf file.
>
>I can send you the output of the nc_test program when it's run against
>serial netcdf if that helps, or i've got it in
>~robl/projects/netcdf-3.5.0/src
Thanks. I got it.
Well, why does my nc_test against ncmpi_ library turn out to be
all "FAILURE"s instead of expected "ok"s?
For example, at the very beginning, when testing "open test.nc"
I obviously can not find "test.nc" in my nc_test DIR (of course
it will FAIL).
Am I missing sth. from the cvs?
Another question about the tests: How do you test parallel APIs?
Just call them in serial code or test them in a real parallel
environment? If it's the latter case, how do I specify number of
processors when I submit "mpirun"?
--
Jianwei
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list