further nc_test progress

[Jianwei Li]

cool!

One comment while I'm looking into the nc_test code:
	When I was linking the nc_test, I get these errors:
	
		test_put.o: In function `test_ncmpi_put_var_short':
		test_put.o(.text+0x59b2): undefined reference to
				`ncmpi_put_var_type_all'
	
	Just for your information, ncmpi_put_var_type_all is not defined
	in our parallel interface since is of no use and meaningless, though
	'ncmpi_get_var_type_all' does exist and is intended to optimize
	processes all requesting a whole array (optimization not implemented
	yet?).
	
I'll keep going through the tests and hope to find sth.
	
--
Jianwei

>
>I've taken care of the read cases (test_get.m4 ) so that they either
>call the _all version of the function or (in the case of the var1
>functions) go into indep data mode before making the function call.
>
>So now the tests go pretty far, and we do get a lot of "good
>comparisons", but we do get a few discrepancies.  We also fail to
>complete the test.  ncmpi_get_vara_short kills the test with this
>error: 
>
>MPI_Type_create_subarray: Invalid value in array_of_subsizes
>ABORT - process 0: Invalid buffer pointer
>Return code = -1, signaled with Aborted
>
>If anyone wants to take a closer look at nc_test, i've committed all
>my collective and indep-mode changes to cvs.
>
>==rob
>
>-- 
>Rob Latham
>Mathematics and Computer Science Division    A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
>Argonne National Labs, IL USA                B29D F333 664A 4280 315B