[Nek5000-users] Conversion problem using exo2nek

nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Thu May 31 10:47:28 CDT 2018


yes you are right..it shows like this now : 
title = Created by ICEMCFD - EXODUS II Interface 

num_dim = 3 
num_nodes = 9261 
num_elem = 1000 
num_elem_blk = 1 
num_side_sets = 6 

element block id = 1 
element type = 
num_elem_in_block = 1000 
num_nodes_per_elem = 27 

side set 0 num_sides = 0 
side set 0 num_sides = 0 
side set 0 num_sides = 0 
side set 0 num_sides = 0 
side set 0 num_sides = 0 
side set 0 num_sides = 0 

QA records = 

Converting elements ... 
done :: Converting elements 

Converting SideSets ... 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

Sideset 0 ... 
done :: Sideset 0 

done :: Converting SideSets 



De: "nek5000-users" <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> 
À: "nek5000-users" <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> 
Envoyé: Jeudi 31 Mai 2018 17:43:07 
Objet: Re: [Nek5000-users] Conversion problem using exo2nek 

Details about the side sets included in the exodus file are printed during exo2nek execution. 
If none are reported, then the problem is most likely in the ICEM export step. 






On 31 May 2018, at 17:39, [ mailto:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] wrote: 

I checked the exo2nek.f file and I try to see the outputs to see wether is there any side sets. Then i encountered that there is no side sets. But i believe that I gave the side set numbers correctly on ICEM. 

Anyway I am gonna try again. So please dont care about the previous .re2 file. and sorry for lots of emails. 

Thank you 



De: "nek5000-users" < [ mailto:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] > 
À: "nek5000-users" < [ mailto:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] > 
Envoyé: Jeudi 31 Mai 2018 17:25:47 
Objet: Re: [Nek5000-users] Conversion problem using exo2nek 

Can you post the exo2nek output? 


BQ_BEGIN

On 31 May 2018, at 17:21, [ mailto:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] wrote: 

Hi, 

I read the informations regarding the BC from exo2nek folder of NEK5000. 

There it says the 5th argument of fluid bc array. 

But when I acces it throught the user file everything is zero it seems. (like this bc(5,j,i,1) ) 

Could you please tell me if there is any problem with my conversion of exo2nek? 

Thank you 
Sijo 
_______________________________________________ 
Nek5000-users mailing list 
[ mailto:Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] 
[ https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users | https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users ] 





_______________________________________________ 
Nek5000-users mailing list 
[ mailto:Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] 
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users 
_______________________________________________ 
Nek5000-users mailing list 
[ mailto:Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov | Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov ] 
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users 

BQ_END



_______________________________________________ 
Nek5000-users mailing list 
Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov 
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20180531/5d2b9f55/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Nek5000-users mailing list