[Nek5000-users] Curved boundary

[nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]

Note, all triple digit versions like 17.0.4 and 17.0.0 are _internal_ development versions. The only official release up to now is v17.0 (available as tarball only). Anyway, yes even in v17.0 we disabled certain features for PnPn as some combinations are not yet supported or well tested. It's very likely that some of the might work out of the box but we offically we don't support them (at least for now).

Stefan.   

-----Original message-----
> From:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
> Sent: Friday 18th May 2018 13:58
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] Curved boundary
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a case with a curved boundary with SYM boundary condition, stress 
> formulation and PN/PN.
> 
> In the file core/bdry.f there is a function called CHKCBC, which checks 
> the consistency of boundary conditions.
> 
> In the latest release (mver=17.0.4), this routine requires stress 
> formulation AND PN/PN-2 for a non-aligned boundary, whereas in 
> mver=17.0.0 stress formulation with PN/PN was accepted.
> 
> My question is whether this change was intentional?
> 
> The test
> "IF ( .NOT.IFSTRS ) CALL CHKCBC"
> in function SETLOG in v17.0.0 was replaced by
> "if (ifstrs .and. .not.ifsplit) return"
> inside CHKCBC in v17.0.4.
> 
> As a test, I commented out the check in CHKCBC, and the simulation seems 
> to run just fine with stress formulation and PN/PN.
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl Erik,
> FFI, Norway
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>