[Nek5000-users] nelgv in uservp of conj_ht
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jan 24 11:41:31 CST 2017
Case (1) is correct way to impose properties for the solid. The interface condition will match the fluxes (in a weak sense) while heat capacity can discontinuous.
-----Original message-----
> From:nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday 24th January 2017 17:28
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] nelgv in uservp of conj_ht
>
> Hello All,
> I have a question in uservp of conjugate heat transfer. I am trying to modify the conjugate heat transfer problem (with additional passive scalars) and use for solving MHD problem with vector potential approach.
>
> I tested the conjugate heat transfer case changing the IF condition in uservp in following ways.
>
> Case 1:
> if (ieg .gt. nelgv) then ! properties in the solid
> udiff = 0.1*param(8) ! conductivity
> utrans = 1.0
> endif
>
> Case 2:
> if (y .ge. 1.5D0) then
> udiff= 0.1*param(8)
> elseif (y. le. 0.5D0) then
> udiff= 0.1*param(8)
> else
> udiff = param(8)
> endif
>
> I got a small difference in the temperature profile at the interface between solid and fluid.
> Could you please let me know, how do the above two cases affect the conditions imposed at the interface (what is the mathematical treatment and how does it change).
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Sandeep
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list