[Nek5000-users] Set forcing in .rea and in .usr

[nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]

Thanks for your answer, but I mean set_forcing subroutine, which make ffx to keep u_bar=1. Isn't it?
Best regards, 
Mark вторник, 29 августа 2017г., 18:53 +07:00 от  nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov :

>
>Hi Mark,
>
>p54/55 control mass flux (i.e., keep mass flux constant).
>
>ffx keeps the body force constant.
>
>Thus, using p54/55 will definitely exhibit better control of the mass flux.
>
>hth,
>Paul
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>From: Nek5000-users < nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov > on behalf of  nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov < nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov >
>Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 10:06:23 PM
>To: nek5000-users
>Subject: [Nek5000-users] Set forcing in .rea and in .usr
> 
>Hi, Neks!
>
>Could you please shortly explain me, what is the difference between set forcing in .rea (p54&p55) and in .usr (set_forcing) files. In fact, via testing these two options I found that in case of .rea file u_bar is kept more precisely.
>
>Best regards,
>Mark 
>_______________________________________________
>Nek5000-users mailing list
>Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20170829/7b723c45/attachment.html>