[Nek5000-users] convective boundary conditions
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Wed Mar 9 20:58:28 CST 2016
Hi Neks,
regarding my question about convective boundary conditions:
In the problem that I am solving, there are vortex traveling across the
boundary. Using O boundary conditions, the solution blows up (due to the
negative flux of the vortex). On the contrary, if I use ON, the
simulation continues running, but I get very strong reflections.
In addition, although my flow is laminar, if I use turb_outflow
subroutine (with O boundary conditions) with rq=2, the simulation works
better, but at a certain moment, it also crashes. I am wondering if I
should increase rq to, let say 3, or maybe I should use a different
boundary condition, i.e. non reflective.
I would like to ask, if I am using turb_outflow subroutine I am imposing
grad U>0 in the boundary (please correct me if I am wrong). The question
is, is it physical? What I am doing is
-pn+(1/Re)(n*grad(U))>0 ? What does it mean?
Finally, I have seen that in 2015 you implemented some non-reflective
boundary conditions and they were working very well. Please, could you
help me with this issue? (i.e.: a piece of advise or some procedure to
follow...)
Thank you very much in advance.
SL
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list