[Nek5000-users] Pn-pn formulation

[nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]

   Hi paul,

   Thanks for reply. Is it good to maintain Pn- Pn for DNS too ??

    Regards,
    Kamal


On 03/06/2014 11:17, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> For LES, the extra resolution in the pressure that the PnPn formulation
> has tends to yield better results.
>
> Paul
>
> ________________________________________
> From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] on behalf of nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov [nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 4:08 AM
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] Pn-pn formulation
>
> Hi Neks,
>
> I found that in the turbulence channel example, (Pn-Pn) formulation is
> used instead of (Pn-Pn-2) is there a reason behind to choose that
> formulation for the channel flow (SEM) ??. Could some one please tell me
> what difference does it make.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Best Regards,
> Kamal
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users