[Nek5000-users] Output of temperature gradient, scalar dissipation rate and convective flux
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Fri Sep 28 08:06:12 CDT 2012
Hi Paul,
seems to work:
if ((mod(istep,iostep).eq.0).and.(istep.ge.iostep)) then
!-----Temperature gradient
call gradm1(dtdx,dtdy,dtdz,t)
do i=1,n
!-----Convective current
velu=vz(i,1,1,1)
uzt(i) = t(i,1,1,1,1)*velu
!-----Thermal dissipation epsT=(grad T)**2/sqrt(RaPr)
gradt2=dtdx(i)**2+dtdy(i)**2+dtdz(i)**2
epst(i)=gradt2*rapr
enddo
!-------No pressure field, no scalar output
ifpo=.false.
ifto=.false.
call outpost2(dtdx,dtdy,dtdz,pr,t,0,'gdt')
call outpost2( t, uzt,epsT,pr,t,0,'uzt')
ifpo=.true.
ifto=.true.
endif
Best regards, Joerg.
> Hi Joerg,
>
> You can set ifpo=.false. just before the call to outpost.
> You can then turn it back on.
>
> You can also output multiple passive scalars. For this, however, you
> need to call outpost2(), which has a slightly different interface.
> Have a look at the source and hopefully it will be clear how to proceed
> if you wish to dump additional scalar fields in that way.
>
> For myself, I tend to just use outpost() and then insert whatever I need
> in the vx-vy-vz slots, coupled with different prefixes, as in the example
> below.
>
> Paul
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:22:27 AM
> Subject: [Nek5000-users] Output of temperature gradient, scalar
> dissipation rate and convective flux
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the following suggestion concerning our post processing
> where we need temperature gradients, scalar dissipation rate and
> convective heat fluxes:
>
> subroutine userchk
> :
> parameter (lt=lx1*ly1*lz1*lelt)
> common /mygrad/ tx(lt),ty(lt),tz(lt)
> :
> if (mod(istep,iostep).eq.0) then ! , say,
> call gradm1(tx,ty,tz,t)
> call outpost(tx,ty,tz,pr,t,'gdt') ! write to gdtblah.f000...
> endif
> :
> return
> end
>
> It has however one shortcoming, namely the unnecessary additional
> output of the pressure field which we don't need
> for this analysis.
>
> As far as I can see when going down from the routine outpost -->
> outpost2 --> prepost this is a fixed
> structure and the pressure field cannot be simply substituted by
> another scalar field (e.g. the scalar dissipation rate)
> since it might have a different dimension (e.g. in case of spaces
> Pn-Pn-2 which we are using).
>
> --- Can this problem be solved without editing the routines prepost?
> --- Is prepost_map inside prepost still necessary?
>
> Thanks, Joerg.
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list