[Nek5000-users] changing the number of cores in conjunction with new restart

[nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov]

Thank you to both of you for your input.

It sounds like the issue has to do with pn-pn-2 pressure mapping,
so I'll look there as a starting point.

Paul


On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:

> Hi Johan;
>
> I used both PN_PN and PN_PN-2. I had the same experience with PN_PN-2;
> however, PN_PN survived and ran very well. By any chance, I just wanted
> to say thanks to Paul for developing this new restart features. It's
> amazingly well preserving the field.
>
> Best regards
> Azad
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:19:30 +0100
>> From: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> Subject: [Nek5000-users] changing the number of cores in conjunction
>> 	with	new restart
>> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> Message-ID: <4F54D982.5030403 at mech.kth.se>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Dear nek5000 developers,
>>
>> I just wanted to share an observation that I've done. I've seen that the
>> velocity field is a bit reshuffled when I use the new accurate restart
>> feature in nek5000 and restart with a different number of cores compared
>> to the number used when the rs8blah0.f* were written out. Has anyone
>> noticed this? Could there be a bug somewhere in the related routines? If
>> not, then maybe we use the routines in the wrong way. We've used a few
>> versions > 75? of the code.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Johan Malm
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:23:32 -0600 (CST)
>> From: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> Subject: Re: [Nek5000-users] changing the number of cores in
>> 	conjunction with	new restart
>> To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203050922320.6248 at v8.mcs.anl.gov>
>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>>
>>
>> Dear Johan,
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this to our attention.  It's certainly
>> possible... That feature has not yet had a lot of exercise,
>> particularly over a broad range of usage variants.  We'll take
>> a look right away.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:
>>
>>> Dear nek5000 developers,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to share an observation that I've done. I've seen that the
>>> velocity field is a bit reshuffled when I use the new accurate restart
>>> feature in nek5000 and restart with a different number of cores compared
>>> to the number used when the rs8blah0.f* were written out. Has anyone
>>> noticed this? Could there be a bug somewhere in the related routines? If
>>> not, then maybe we use the routines in the wrong way. We've used a few
>>> versions > 75? of the code.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Johan Malm
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>>
>>
>> End of Nek5000-users Digest, Vol 37, Issue 6
>> ********************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>