[Nek5000-users] Traveling gravity waves
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Thu Dec 6 16:05:00 CST 2012
Hi Ammar,
as I am using a single deepwater wave with amplitude a = 0.01 and
wavenumber k = 1 the steepness := k*a = 0.01 is quite low.
Higher Order terms from Stokes
Theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes_wave can be neglected as they
are small
For example the third order solution for deep
water http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes_wave#Third-order_Stokes_wave_on_deep_water doesn't differ from the Airy Theory so the velocities are correct to order 3 in the pertubation series with respect to the
steepness
k*a
Only the surface elevation differs in the order O( a²k +a³k) which
should be neglectable as well.
I want to simulate a simple wave and than goto steeper waves with
higher nonlinearities (Stokes) in order to create a test case to see what
resolution and parameters are needed in NEK5000
and then step up to more complex sea states. I already simulated this
wave with a pseudo-spectral method which stability strongly depends on
accurate initial Conditions and could simulate many periods without
problems.
All the best, Arne
PS: I'll let you know if 3rd Stokes made a difference
Zitat von nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov:
>
>
>
> * I am not an expert on surface waves but just wondering if
> * you are initializing with one wave component such as this?
> *
>
>
> My understanding is you should have multiple components to see
> something interesting. This can be simply achieved by modulating the
> above
> form by a spatial localization function such as exp(-(x-x0)2) or
> add other components such as a1 cos(kx...)+ a2 cos(2kx...)+...etc
>
> Ammar
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:38 AM, <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Neks,
>>
>> I am trying to set up a traveling gravity wave and started from the
>> std.wv example.
>>
>> - In the useric I prescribed the the Initial velocity by using linear
>> wave theory (Airy)
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airy_wave_theory#Solution_for_a_progressive_monochromatic_wave
>> wave amplitude
>> - the initial mesh was generate with genbox with periodic sides, bottom
>> wall and a free surface
>> - the surface tension was excluded by setting sigma & We = 0
>> - reverted density & viscosity to dimensional variables (SI Units) in
>> the .rea to get correct velocities
>> - set the gravitational force in userf ffy = -9.81*param(1)
>>
>> But instead of a traveling wave the system reverts to a sort
>> of standing
>> wave immediately
>>
>> Do I have set the initial velocity of the moving mesh as well?
>> And if so
>> are wx,wy the correct variables to do so?
>> Did I apply the dimensions correctly?
>>
>> I attached the .rea & .usr, any help with my Problem would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Arne
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nek5000-users mailing list
>> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://aelghany.googlepages.com/home
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20121206/947ad907/attachment.html>
More information about the Nek5000-users
mailing list