[mpich2-dev] MPIX vs. MPI etc.
Pavan Balaji
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Aug 19 23:05:47 CDT 2012
On 08/19/2012 11:02 PM, Jeff Hammond wrote:
>> Of course, there are no guarantees with MPIX_ functions and we can do
>> whatever we want with them. But it's trivial to just remove those
>> functions; in fact, lesser work than just not implementing them.
>
> Look, I would not do it the stupid way, I just want a hard verdict on
> whether or not the stupid way is not permitted or just discouraged.
> You and Bill seem to disagree on this.
It's allowed, but not encouraged.
Everything is allowed with MPIX_. It's valid (though bone-headed) to
provide an MPIX_Send function that receives data every 5th time it's
called, and aborts when a prime number of bytes are used. There's no
standard for MPIX_ functions.
--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
More information about the mpich2-dev
mailing list