[MPICH] Intel 10.1

[Rajeev Thakur]

Also, can you send us the outputs of configure and make (not config.log but
the output printed on the screen by configure). You can send them to
mpich2-maint at mcs.anl.gov.

Rajeev

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:49 PM
> To: Mike Colonno
> Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: Re: [MPICH] Intel 10.1
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Can you send us a small sample code (the smallest that you 
> can create) that shows this problem? It'll be a lot easier 
> for us to work with it.
> 
>   -- Pavan
> 
> On 02/13/2008 09:38 PM, Mike Colonno wrote:
> >    Simple cases, like the test cases that come with MPICH 
> distributions, seem to work fine for n = anything. Any more 
> sophisticated code works for n = small number (8 is typical) 
> but fails for n > this number. This is independent of how the 
> processes are distributed (number of processes / server). I 
> have tried several different version of MPICH and MPICH2, 
> including the one you mentioned, but all have the same 
> result. This leads me to believe the issue lies with the 
> compiler(s). We're using x64 servers, 2 dual-core Xeons per 
> machine, RHEL 4.3 and 4.5 (upgrading OS had no effect). 
> >  
> >    Thanks,
> >    ~Mike C.
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Pavan Balaji [mailto:balaji at mcs.anl.gov]
> > Sent: Wed 2/13/2008 7:22 PM
> > To: Mike Colonno
> > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: Re: [MPICH] Intel 10.1
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Mike,
> > 
> > We internally use Intel 9.1. We are still waiting on a site license 
> > for Intel 10.1. Are you using mpich2-1.0.6p1? Also, what hardware 
> > platform are you running these tests on?
> > 
> > Can you try a simple test and see if it works fine:
> > 
> >   $ mpiexec hostname
> > 
> >   -- Pavan
> > 
> > On 02/13/2008 08:55 PM, Mike Colonno wrote:
> >>    Hi folks ~
> >>
> >>    Has anyone out there had any luck building MPICH and / 
> or MPICH2 (and subsequent MPI applications) with Intel 10.1 
> compilers (C++ and Fortran)? If so, please forward me the 
> details (flags, versions, OS, etc.). All of my MPI programs 
> suffer "collective abort" errors killed by signal 9 or 11 
> (with essentially no repeatable pattern between the two) 
> which are likely caused by seg. faults behind the scenes.  
> These codes worked great on older hardware / compiler 
> versions and despite a large number of experiments I have 
> been unable to find the secret. Compiled in sequential mode 
> (without MPI) they all function well.
> >>
> >>    Thanks,
> >>    ~Mike C.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > --
> > Pavan Balaji
> > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> 
>