[MPICH] collective abort of all ranks
Anthony Chan
chan at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Jun 11 15:22:58 CDT 2007
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > The assignment statement is competing with MPI with memory and it
> > is related to how fortran compiler uses memory. I am not familar with
> > fortran 90 compiler to say much here, but both intel-8.1 compiler and
> > absoft 8.0 compiler are pretty old, so you may want to use other newer
> > fortran compilers if possible. If gfortran is working fine, why don't you
> > use gfortran then.
> >
>
> The test.f90 that I attached is a reduced test case from a large code.
> The original code uses functions from IMSL libraries. These IMSl
> libraries were supplied by absoft compiler. So I am stuck with absoft
> compiler.
>
> Is there any free equivalent for IMSl libraries?
>
The last time I used IMSL is when I was still in school, it wasn't free
then. Probably still not free now. IMSL is a big numerical library,
I doubt if you can get even a functional equivalent library not to mention
the API. I cc'ed this back to mpich-discuss to see anyone know this
better.
A.Chan
More information about the mpich-discuss
mailing list