[MPICH] MPICH 1 or 2: heterogeneous data representation?
Matthew Chambers
matthew.chambers at vanderbilt.edu
Fri Apr 20 09:52:33 CDT 2007
You are definitely going to need heterogeneous support. 64 bit/32 bit is
enough to cause that, and I don't even know what the type sizes are on the
Alpha machine (or the endianness for that matter). All the Intel machines
at least are little endian.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-mpich-
> discuss at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Rob
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:57 AM
> To: mpich
> Subject: [MPICH] MPICH 1 or 2: heterogeneous data representation?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm about to configure a cluster system with:
> master = Intel/Xeon Pentium4
>
> nodes =
> Intel/Xeon 32 bits
> Intel/Itanium 64 bits
> Alpha/Ev65
>
> *ALL* of these machines run Linux CentOS 4.4.
>
> Now, I don't know whether "heterogeneous data
> representation" is an issue here, because they
> are all running the same OS.
> Is the OS or the hardware relevant?
>
> Hence I don't know whether to choose MPICH1 or
> MPICH2.
>
> Thanks for help!
>
> Rob.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the mpich-discuss
mailing list