itaps-parallel Questions about iMeshP

[Tim Tautges]

Sorry for all the traffic, I'm obviously doing way too much email way too quickly.

I'll let others speak for the need for multiple partitions, or lack thereof.  We'll need it in MOAB, whether it works 
through iMeshP is up to y'all.

- tim

Tim Tautges wrote:
> Correct.
> 
> - tim
> 
> Mark Beall wrote:
>> For the known examples of needing multiple partitionings is there 
>> generally any correlation between the partitions (meaning that 
>> entities in one partitioning end up on the same processors as entities 
>> in the other partitioning)? I assuming there is a very low correlation 
>> between the partitionings, almost by definition (since, otherwise, why 
>> have the other partitioning). Is that correct?
>>
>> mark
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Tim Tautges wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting.  I've thought about PIC codes in the context, but always 
>>> wondered whether apps would consider it overkill to do the particles 
>>> with vertices (which I think is what you're implying below?  Or not?)
>>>
>>> - tim
>>>
>>> Devine, Karen D wrote:

-- 
================================================================
"You will keep in perfect peace him whose mind is
   steadfast, because he trusts in you."               Isaiah 26:3

              Tim Tautges            Argonne National Laboratory
          (tautges at mcs.anl.gov)      (telecommuting from UW-Madison)
          phone: (608) 263-8485      1500 Engineering Dr.
            fax: (608) 263-4499      Madison, WI 53706