itaps-parallel another minor iMeshP issue

Devine, Karen D kddevin at sandia.gov
Thu Oct 16 10:01:34 CDT 2008


True, but for the array-based version iMeshP_getPartNborsArr, we need the
num_part_nbors argument.  I didn't know whether to favor similarity between
the two functions or minimalism in the argument lists.




On 10/15/08 4:27 PM, "Jason Kraftcheck" <kraftche at cae.wisc.edu> wrote:

> iMeshP_getPartNbors :  args num_part_nbors and nbor_part_ids_size are
>                        the same.  We should drop the first one.
>
>
>
>
>






More information about the itaps-parallel mailing list