itaps-parallel another minor iMeshP issue
Devine, Karen D
kddevin at sandia.gov
Thu Oct 16 10:01:34 CDT 2008
True, but for the array-based version iMeshP_getPartNborsArr, we need the
num_part_nbors argument. I didn't know whether to favor similarity between
the two functions or minimalism in the argument lists.
On 10/15/08 4:27 PM, "Jason Kraftcheck" <kraftche at cae.wisc.edu> wrote:
> iMeshP_getPartNbors : args num_part_nbors and nbor_part_ids_size are
> the same. We should drop the first one.
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the itaps-parallel
mailing list