itaps-parallel Next Phone Conf
Devine, Karen D
kddevin at sandia.gov
Wed Jun 18 16:20:05 CDT 2008
Mark: Thank you for your quick reply. Carl leaves town on Thursday next
week, so we have a null intersection. :)
All: Is this Friday 6/20 too soon to get the homework done and talk again?
Karen
On 6/18/08 3:18 PM, "Mark Shephard" <shephard at scorec.rpi.edu> wrote:
> Karen,
>
> I am suppose to be in a plane at that time. The only days that work for
> me are Thursday and Friday. If Onkar and Ting are available, you may
> want to keep that time. I am asking them to indicate if they Can be on
> (I know there is a week coming-up that Ting is out.)
>
> Ting and Onkar will look at the items indicated below.
>
> Mark
>
> Devine, Karen D wrote:
>> Mark: We chose Wed. June 25 at noon PDT as the next phone conference time,
>> subject to your approval. Let me know if this time works, or send me a list
>> of alternate times.
>>
>> All: For the next phone conference, please go through the parallel
>> interface, considering the implications of satisfying and not satisfying the
>> following requirements for part handles; we will make a decision at the next
>> phone conf.
>> + Part handles are globally unique (so that remote part handles make
>> sense and Zoltan doesn't go insane);
>> + Part handles allow identification (without communication or O(#parts)
>> storage) of what process the part lives on;
>> + Part handles can be created and returned by iMeshP_createPart without
>> communication;
>> + Part handles can be distinguished from entity set handles so that our
>> overloading of many iMesh functions works.
>>
>> For reference, see the thread "Removal of" from March in the itaps-parallel
>> archives.
>>
>> Thank you for your time today.
>> Karen
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the itaps-parallel
mailing list