[Darshan-users] Darshan & IPM results not the same

Vineet Soni vsoni at mercator-ocean.fr
Mon Nov 8 04:05:19 CST 2021


I am trying to analyze the IO behavior of our codes with Darshan.
Darshan: 3.3.0
Compilers: Intel 2018
MPI: Intel MPI 2018
FS: Lustre (lustre-module disabled in Darshan configuration)
Darshan profiling: LD_PRELOAD

I observe a big difference in IO results from Darshan and IPM (v2.0.5) for one of our codes. I guess that both profilers are not profiling the same POSIX calls?

The POSIXIO calls profiled in IPM are:

fopen, fdopen, freopen, open, open64
fclose, close
fread, read
fwrite, write
fseek, lseek, lseek64
fgetpos, fsetpos, fgetc, getc, ungetc
truncate, ftruncate, truncate64, ftruncate64

While the ones profiled by Darshan are: https://github.com/darshan-hpc/darshan/blob/main/darshan-runtime/lib/darshan-posix.c ?

However, the huge difference is observed in the “read” call, which exists in both the profilers.

|                   |     IPM    |  Darshan  |
| Read (s)          |     324.57 |      6.02 |
| Agg. Read (count) | 34 766 456 | 2 946 271 |

I tested Darshan and IPM with other codes (reading NOT the same files) to check if this issue is faced in them as well. But, I got the same results.
So, I don't understand what could be the reason that this application is not giving the same results.

Do you have any idea of why this could happen?

Thanks in advance.

PS: The application does a lot of IO, and is expected to spend a significant time in read operations.

Best regards,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/darshan-users/attachments/20211108/6642bfe8/attachment.html>

More information about the Darshan-users mailing list