[codes-ross-users] AVL tree size

[Mubarak, Misbah]

That’s inline with my observation.

From: <codes-ross-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:codes-ross-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov>> on behalf of Nikhil Jain <nikhil.jain at acm.org<mailto:nikhil.jain at acm.org>>
Date: Friday, February 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM
To: "Jenkins, Jonathan P." <jenkins at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:jenkins at mcs.anl.gov>>
Cc: "codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>" <codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>>
Subject: Re: [codes-ross-users] AVL tree size

I haven't observed performance differential with changing AVL tree size, but have definitely seen aborts for large simulations when they run out of tree nodes.

--Nikhil

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Jenkins, Jonathan P. <jenkins at mcs.anl.gov<mailto:jenkins at mcs.anl.gov>> wrote:
Hi all,

Does the AVL tree size parameter have effects on performance, or is it simply the number of nodes for AVL operations that are allocated at startup?

Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
codes-ross-users mailing list
codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov<mailto:codes-ross-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/codes-ross-users



--
Nikhil Jain, nikhil.jain at acm.org<mailto:nikhil.jain at acm.org>, http://charm.cs.uiuc.edu/people/nikhil
Doctoral Candidate @ CS, UIUC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/codes-ross-users/attachments/20160212/2429ac23/attachment.html>