[cgma-dev] iGeom extension functions?

[Jane Hu]

Hi, Jim

I didn't work on iGeom level before, and wasn't very sure what the spec's
are. I did add a function declaration in iGeom.h yesterday though. Not sure
if this affected the Python build. Please let me know if you'd rather to
make any changes for it.

Thanks.

Jane


On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:50 PM, James Porter <jvporter at wisc.edu> wrote:

> Even though the iGeom spec isn't as firm as iMesh's, perhaps we should put
> our extra, non-standard functions in a separate header file. This would make
> it easier to write iGeom code that works on multiple implementations, and
> would help me write Python bindings for iGeom that work with other
> implementations too (currently, if any function that is bound to Python
> doesn't exist in the iGeom implementation, it refuses to load the .so).
>
> Thoughts/opinions on this?
>
> - Jim
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/cgma-dev/attachments/20110930/cd374315/attachment.htm>