[AG-TECH] 회신: All client in same venue use same bridge?

Sangil Choi siChoi at nm.gist.ac.kr
Tue Aug 10 05:18:55 CDT 2010


Thanks for your response.

In server machine, I turned off a firewall at that time. So I thought it
does not matter.

I edited my command likes that.
dbeacon -4 -n "nfri ag" -b ipv4.dbeacon.aarnet.net.au -O -a sichoi at netmedia.
gist.ac.kr -C KR

However, my name was not updated in web site.

Regards,
Sangil Choi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bell [mailto:j.bell at cqu.edu.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:42 PM
To: Sangil Choi; John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
Cc: Sang Woo HAN; Namgon Kim; HyungJin Kim
Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] 회신: All client in same venue use same bridge?

Sangil

In regards to "hostname"...  Are we talking about seeing your beacon (NFRI-
AG-Server) displayed on http://syd-a-ext1.aarnet.net.au/matrix/????  As the
option (-n "NFRI-AG-Server") is just a name to identify a beacon, not the
actually hostname of the machine.

I wouldn't worry too much about the 'Multicast Available' button in the
'Venue Client', as it should not affect the running on any of the multicast
beacon.

The issue might be that a firewall of some description might be blocking
traffic preventing the beacon from working.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Regards,
Jason.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sangil Choi [mailto:sichoi at netmedia.gist.ac.kr] 
Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2010 6:22 PM
To: Jason Bell; John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
Cc: Sang Woo HAN; Namgon Kim; HyungJin Kim
Subject: 회신: [AG-TECH] 회신: All client in same venue use same bridge?

Thanks, Jason.

My command was that.

dbeacon -4 -n "NFRI-AG-Server" -b ipv4.dbeacon.aarnet.net.au -O -a
sichoi at netmedia.gist.ac.kr -C KR

However, I couldn't find my host name in 'Multicast Beacon' matrix.
Is that any problem in my command?

'The Multicast not available site problem' could be the factor of this
problem? However I can see 'Multicast Available' button in the 'Venue
Client'. In multicast not available site, is it possible?

Regards,
Sangil Choi.

________________________________________
보낸 사람: Jason Bell [j.bell at cqu.edu.au]
보낸 날짜: 2010년 8월 10일 화요일 오전 11:08
받는 사람: Sangil Choi; John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
참조: Sang Woo HAN; Namgon Kim; HyungJin Kim
제목: RE: [AG-TECH] 회신:   All client in same venue use same bridge?

Sangil

Dbeacon does work on Fedora 12, as I have just tested it.  When you say
"your" host name was not updated on the webpage, what was the command you
were using to execute dbeacon.

I suggest running it using something like:

        dbeacon -4 -n "[your display name] -b ipv4.dbeacon.aarnet.net.au -O
-a [your email address] -C [country code]

For example, I issue the following myself

        dbeacon -4 -n "CQU (Jastest)" -b ipv4.dbeacon.aarnet.net.au -O -a j.
bell at cqu.edu.au -C AU

Hopefully that should work for you.

Additionally, I can see your entries with the NZ beacon
(http://beacon.karen.ac.nz/), which shows that you 2 machine can
communicate between each other using multicast, but fails to communicate
with other beacons.

Note: a Blind beacon is when a beacon cannot talk multicast is any other
beacon.  For example, if you stop "nfri-ag-server.gist.ac.kr", than your
other beacon (nfri-ag-display.gist.ac.kr) will become a blind beacon.

Hope this information helps.

Regards,
Jason.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sangil Choi [mailto:sichoi at netmedia.gist.ac.kr]
Sent: Friday, 6 August 2010 05:41 PM
To: Jason Bell; John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
Cc: Sang Woo HAN; Namgon Kim; HyungJin Kim
Subject: 회신: [AG-TECH] 회신: All client in same venue use same bridge?

Thanks, Jason.

First, I installed the 'dbeacon' and started. However my host name was not
updated in web page and the 'Venue Client's 'Multicast Not Available'
button was enabled. In Fedora 12, 'dbeacon' does not works?

So, I try using the New Zealand beacon. In the 'Venue Client', 'Multicast
Available' button was enabled. However, in matrix, my host was printed in
'Blind Beacons'.

I changed my '/etc/beacon.conf' file like bellow.
==============================
GROUP = 233.176.75.32
CONTACTNAME = NFRI-AG-Dispaly
CONTACTINFO = 000-000-000
CONTACTLOCATION = korea
NOTIFYEMAIL = sichoi at netmedia.gist.ac.kr
OUTPUTDIR = /var/lib/beacon
CENTRALSERVERNAME = beacon.karen.ac.nz
===============================
Is that right?

Regards,
Sangil Choi

________________________________________
보낸 사람: Jason Bell [j.bell at cqu.edu.au]
보낸 날짜: 2010년 8월 6일 금요일 오후 3:49
받는 사람: Sangil Choi; John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
제목: RE: [AG-TECH] 회신:   All client in same venue use same bridge?

Sangil

We now use dbeacon within Australian, as the aarnet beacon server is no
longer running.

See http://www.accessgrid.org/node/1998 for install instructions for
dbeacon for Fedora 13.

Alternatively, you could try using the New Zealand beacon which can be
found at http://beacon.karen.ac.nz/.

Cheers,
Jason.

-----Original Message-----
From: ag-tech-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov [mailto:ag-tech-
bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Sangil Choi
Sent: Friday, 6 August 2010 04:29 PM
To: John I. Quebedeaux, Jr; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: [AG-TECH] 회신: All client in same venue use same bridge?

Thanks, John.

I checked my client and server and I find that multicast beacon is not
installed. I treat that and I show the ‘Multicast Available’ on the venue
client. After that, the client can show the bridge but that is in different
networks(Bridge's in 210.x.x.x / Client's in 203.x.x.x). Unfortunately, the
same problem still remained.

Can you send me your '/etc/beacon.conf' file?

In addition, is the aarnet beacon server works well?
I couldn't open aarnet beacon server's web
page(http://beacon2.aarnet.net.au). So I doesn't see the 'multicast beacon
table'.

I would appreciate your help with this.

Regards,
Sangil Choi.

________________________________________
보낸 사람: John I. Quebedeaux, Jr [johnq at lsu.edu]
보낸 날짜: 2010년 7월 31일 토요일 오전 2:04
받는 사람: Sangil Choi; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
제목: Re: [AG-TECH]  All client in same venue use same bridge?

Sangil,

It's simple reason why this is the case: If two bridges do not have
multicast connectivity between them, then the traffic between the two
bridges can not reach each other.

On the same bridge, you can be sure everyone is connected to the same
traffic; but, if on different bridges - currently there is no way to be sure
that the multicast traffic reaches between bridges without testing.

Currently, there is no way without just testing which bridges do this - and
sometimes the networks change between sites that multicast breaks and until
reported isn't fixed.

For an event, I will typically (if required) suggest which bridge sites
should utilize if they aren't multicast capable that I know can work between
bridges. *most* of our sites here are now multicast enabled however, so we
try not to rely on bridges at all.

note: be sensitive to using other people's bridges because that will incur
extra traffic on their network (if for large # of clients and bandwidth,
this could be a problem for some sites hosting bridges without them
realizing it).

We have 'internal' bridges in our state where we have our own registry that
we only give out to our Louisiana site nodes so they only show up for our
clients. Very useful way to take advantage of the registry feature.

-John Q.
--
John I. Quebedeaux, Jr.; Louisiana State University
Computer Manager LBRN; 131 Life Sciences Bldg.
e-mail: johnq at lsu.edu; web: http://lbrn.lsu.edu
phone: 225-578-0062 / fax: 225-578-2597


> From: Sangil Choi <sichoi at netmedia.gist.ac.kr>
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:39:42 +0900
> To: "ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov" <ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov>
> Subject: [AG-TECH]  All client in same venue use same bridge?
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've problem about bridge.
>
>
>
> I installed 'AGTk3.2 beta 1' on three nodes and includes that as one
venue.
>
> In that case, I found the problem about communicate each others.
>
> If the nodes connect with same bridge, the node can find other node's
> information in RAT and vic.
>
> In other case, nodes connect with different bridges to communicate each
other,
> there are no RAT and vic information of other nodes.
>
> If one node uses bridge and others use multicast, bridge connected node
can
> find multicast node's information in RAT and vic.
>
>
>
> Could you tell me about reason about this?
>
> This problem occurs from our mistake?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sangil Choi.
>
>
>
> p.s : Used bridge is not ours and other bridge works as same problem.



More information about the ag-tech mailing list